Peer2Peer Finance News
The UK's first peer-to-peer finance magazine for investors and the industry
  • Home
  • News
    • Personal Finance News
    • Industry News
    • SME News
    • Global News
  • Property
  • IFISA
    • IFISA Guide
  • Video
  • Open Banking
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Features
    • Joint Ventures and Promoted Content
  • Comment & Analysis
  • What is P2P?
  • Partners
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • P2P Power 50
    • Power 50 2020
    • Power 50 2019
    • Power 50 2018
    • Power 50 2017
  • Sign up to our e-newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Directory
  • Jobs
  • My Account
    • Manage Account
    • Change Password
    • Log In
    • Log Out
shutterstock_1129968467
July 10 2018

Advisers eschewing P2P due to insurance ‘grey area’

Emily Perryman Industry News, News Brendan Llewellyn, IFA, p2p, PII, Professional indemnity insurance, Russel Facer, threesixty

FINANCIAL advisers are avoiding giving advice on peer-to-peer lending because they are worried it will not be covered by their professional indemnity insurance (PII).

Max Lehrain, chief operating officer at P2P property lender Relendex, said P2P investing is a “grey area” when it comes to PII.

Some independent financial advisers (IFAs) assume it is covered under the general advice section of their policy, whereas others do not think it is covered at all.

Read more: IFAs need to communicate better with clients

Read more: Government seeks views on new financial advice portal

“P2P lending is a new area for IFAs so they lack understanding and are wary their PII won’t cover them if they get it wrong,” said Lehrain.

Brendan Llewellyn, co- founder and director of communications platform Adviser Home, suggested PI insurers will decide whether or not to cover P2P investments on a case-by-case basis.

If, for example, P2P lending comprises a very large proportion of an adviser’s business, it would probably be deemed unacceptable by the insurer and therefore not insured under the policy.

Russell Facer, managing director of threesixty, an adviser support services company, added that insurers are generally sceptical of P2P lending because there is a question mark around whether advisers add value in what is traditionally a direct lender-borrower relationship.

“The risks are unknown, so if the insurer does cover P2P lending they will probably add on a risk premium,” he said. “For advice to be cost-effective, the adviser would therefore need to be recommending P2P lending to high-net-worth individuals.”

A spokesperson for Markel International, a PI insurer, said: “There’s no reason why P2P investments shouldn’t be covered, unless they are speci cally excluded. While Markel currently writes IFA business our appetite for new exposures is limited.”

Read more: Brits take money advice from family, rather than financial advisers

This article featured in the July edition of Peer2Peer Finance News, now available to read online. 

Funding expert joins ThinCats Ask the experts: What are the main benefits of P2P for investors?

Related Posts

Chirag-Shah-Nucleus-new-700x325

Industry News, News, Top 3

Nucleus updates business growth loans

Bank of England

Industry News, News, Top 3

Bank of England supports fintechs to scale-up

Woman has video conference with her remote team using laptop and camera

Industry News, News, Top 3

Remote working set to continue for finance and tech workers

Popular posts:

  • Business Loan Network appoints administrators
  • Starling Bank ready to acquire a lending business
  • Funding Circle chief turns down £190,000 pay rise
  • LCF law firm responds to Treasury compensation scheme
  • Chancellor unveils raft of measures for fintech sector
  • New BBB boss was warned about “glass cliff”
Back To Top
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About
  • Team
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • Privacy
  • T&Cs
  • Disclaimer

Follow Us on Social Media

© Peer2Peer Finance News 2020
• Additional design by